Docs
Getting started
CLI
Plugins
Community
Nx Cloud
Nx Consulting

Rebuilding and Retesting What is Affected

When using Nx you can build and test individual apps and libs.

nx g @nrwl/web:app client
nx g @nrwl/web:app admin
nx g @nrwl/workspace:lib client-feature-main
nx g @nrwl/workspace:lib admin-feature-permissions
nx g @nrwl/workspace:lib components-shared

nx build client
nx build client-feature-main # works if the lib is marked as publishable

nx test client
nx test admin
nx test client-feature-main
nx e2e client-e2e

Now imagine, admin depends on admin-feature-permissions. If we make a change to admin-feature-permissions, we need to make sure nothing in the workspace is broken unintentionally.

Typically, you would do it like this:

nx test admin-feature-permissions
nx build admin
nx test admin
nx e2e admin-e2e

In many organizations, you would have dozens or hundreds of apps and libs. To be productive in a monorepo, you need to be able to check that your change is safe, and rebuilding and retesting everything on every change won't scale, tracing the dependencies manually (as shown above) won't scale either.

Because Nx has built-in computation caching, you could retest and rebuild everything on every commit:

nx run-many --target=test --all
nx run-many --target=lint --all
nx run-many --target=e2e --all
nx run-many --target=build --all

If you use Nx Cloud, this can be a viable option.

Code Changes Analysis

In addition to computation caching, Nx supports code change analysis. Nx uses code analysis to construct a dependency graph of all projects in the workspace. It then uses the dependency graph to determine what needs to be rebuilt and retested based on what you changed in a git branch.

Viewing Dep Graph

Run nx dep-graph to see the dependency graph.

dependency-graph

Affected

To calculate the project affected by your change, Nx needs to know what file you changed. The most direct way to do it is by passing --files:

nx affected:dep-graph --files=libs/admin-feature-permissions/src/index.ts

dependency-graph-affected

In practice, it's easier to use git to determine what files have changed.

nx affected:dep-graph --base=master --head=HEAD

The --base defaults to master and --head defaults to HEAD, so when running it locally you can usually omit it:

nx affected:dep-graph

Nx will find the most common ancestor of the base and head SHAs and will use it to determine what has changed between it and head.

Building/Testing/Printing Affected Projects

nx affected:apps # prints affected apps
nx affected:libs # prints affected libs
nx affected:build # builds affected apps and libs
nx affected:lint # lints affected apps and libs
nx affected:test # tests affected apps and libs
nx affected:e2e # e2e tests affected apps

All of these are just shortcuts for the following:

nx affected --target=ANYTARGET # run ANYTARGET for all affected apps and libs

CI

The SHAs you pass must be defined in the git repository. The master and HEAD SHAs are what you normally use while developing. Most likely you will want to provision other SHAs in your CI environment.

nx affected:build --base=origin/master --head=$PR_BRANCH_NAME # where PR_BRANCH_NAME is defined by your CI system
nx affected:build --base=origin/master~1 --head=origin/master # rerun what is affected by the last commit in master

When Nx can't Understand Your Repository

Nx uses its advanced code analysis to construct a dependency graph of all applications and libraries. Some dependencies, however, cannot be determined statically. But you can define them yourself in nx.json.

{
  "npmScope": "myorg",
  "implicitDependencies": {
    "package.json": "*",
    "tsconfig.json": "*",
    "nx.json": "*"
  },
  "projects": {
    "client": {
      "tags": [],
      "implicitDependencies": []
    },
    "client-e2e": {
      "tags": [],
      "implicitDependencies": ["client"]
    },
    "admin": {
      "tags": [],
      "implicitDependencies": []
    },
    "admin-e2e": {
      "tags": [],
      "implicitDependencies": ["admin"]
    },
    "client-feature-main": {
      "tags": [],
      "implicitDependencies": []
    },
    "admin-feature-permissions": {
      "tags": [],
      "implicitDependencies": []
    },
    "components-shared": {
      "tags": [],
      "implicitDependencies": []
    }
  }
}

The implicitDependencies map is used to define what projects are affected by global files. In this example, any change to package.json will affect all the projects in the workspace, so all of them will have to be rebuilt and retested. You can replace * with an explicit list of projects.

{
  "implicitDependencies": {
    "package.json": ["admin", "client"],
    "tsconfig.json": "*",
    "nx.json": "*"
  }
}

You can also specify dependencies between projects. For instance, if admin-e2e tests both the admin and client applications, you can express this as follows:

{
  "admin-e2e": {
    "tags": [],
    "implicitDependencies": ["client", "admin"]
  }
}

Ignoring Additional Files from Affected Commands

Nx provides two methods to exclude additional glob patterns (files and folders) from affected:* commands.

  • Glob patterns defined in your .gitignore file are ignored.
  • Glob patterns defined in an optional .nxignore file are ignored.

Caching and Affected

Affected and caching are used to solve the same problem: minimize the computation. But they do it differently, and the combination provides better results than one or the other.

The affected command looks at the before and after states of the workspaces and figures out what can be broken by a change. Because it knows the two states, it can deduce the nature of the change. For instance, this repository uses React and Angular. If a PR updates the version of React in the root package.json, Nx will know that only half of the projects in the workspace can be affected. It knows what was changed--the version of React was bumped up.

Caching simply looks at the current state of the workspace and the environment (e.g., version of Node) and checks if somebody already ran the command against this state. Caching knows that something changed, but because there is no before and after states, it doesn't know the nature of the change. In other words, caching is a lot more conservative.

If we only use affected, the list of projects that will be retested is small, but if we test the PR twice, we will run all the tests twice.

If we only use caching, the list of projects that will be retested is larger, but if we test the PR twice, we will only run tests the first time.

Using both allows us to get the best of both worlds. The list of affected projects is as small as it can be, and we never run anything twice.